Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Why Does Inadequate Sleep Increase the Risk of Heart Disease?

If sleep seems like a luxury - or you’re spending too much time tossing and turning and too little in dreamland, you could be increasing your risk for heart disease. Several well-conducted studies looking at sleep duration and heart disease risk came to a similar conclusion – sleep is an underappreciated commodity when it comes to maintaining a healthy heart. Why is sleep so important for heart health – and how much “shut-eye” do you really need?
Sleep and the Risk of Heart Disease: How Much is too Little?

When Japanese researchers followed 98,000 middle-aged and older men and women for 14 years, they discovered that participants who slept 4 hours or less each night not only had a greater risk of heart disease but a higher mortality from other causes as well.

To complicate matters, they also found a higher mortality from heart disease and stroke for participants sleeping 10 hours or longer a night compared to those sleeping seven hours nightly. Based on these findings, too little sleep increases mortality, but spending too many hours in bed isn’t heart healthy either. One could conclude from this study that about seven hours sleep is optimal for a healthy heart.

This data is consistent with other recent studies looking at sleep duration and the risk of heart disease, such as the Harvard-run Nurse’s Health Study. This study found that too little sleep is a risk factor for heart disease, but sleeping more than nine hours a night also raises heart disease risk - not to mention the chance of developing other health problems. Sleep is important not only for resting the eyes and the mind but for preventing a host of other chronic diseases from type 2 diabetes and obesity to some types of cancer.

Why Does Inadequate Sleep Increase the Risk of Heart Disease?
No one knows exactly why too little sleep is bad for the heart, although researchers at Emory University have a theory. Their research revealed that levels of c-reactive protein are 25% higher in people who sleep less than six hours a night. C-reactive protein is a marker for inflammation and an independent predictor of a person’s chance of developing heart disease.
According to data from the Women’s Health Study, c-reactive protein levels are a better marker for heart disease risk than even cholesterol levels. Experts believe that c-reactive protein rises when the arteries are chronically inflamed, a condition that can contribute to a heart attack. Lack of sleep seems to send the body into a state of chronic, low-grade inflammation that elevates the risk of a coronary event.

Another theory is too little sleep stimulates release of cortisol. Cortisol, aptly called the stress hormone, not only increases insulin resistance, a risk factor for heart disease but also negatively affects lipid levels, increases blood pressure and raises the heart rate. Recent studies show that cortisol causes endothelial cells lining arteries to dilate and contract inappropriately, a key event in the development of heart disease. Cortisol levels rise when a person is exposed to physical or mental stress and sleep deprivation seems to be a stressful event when it comes to cortisol secretion.

The Bottom Line?

There’s still more to learn about the role sleep plays in heart disease and other chronic diseases. From what we know, there is an optimal level of sleep, which for most people is around 7 to 8 hours a night. Of course, this sleep should be of good quality – tossing and turning most of the night doesn’t count.

If you have problems getting enough sleep, re-evaluate your priorities, and if you suffer from insomnia, there are natural approaches that can help. Don’t neglect sleep – those hours you spend in dreamland could save your heart.

To know more please visit: http://www.nutricula-u.com



References:
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jan 27;163(2):205-9.
Sleep. 2009 Mar 1;32(3):295-301.
Life Extension Magazine Daily News. 11/16/10. “Poor Sleep Linked to Increased Heart Disease Risk” Vitamin Research Projects. “The Heart-Harming Effects of Cortisol”
J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46:344 -350.

Sunday, February 20, 2011

Home | blog | Media Kit | Contact us

Breaking Down the Comparative Guide to Nutritional Supplements



One of the most difficult decisions a person can make regarding their health is choosing among the myriad nutritional vitamin supplements. While it is recognized that most people stand to benefit by taking a multivitamin or other vitamin supplementation, there is a lot of controversy over which formula is optimal for the human body. Because of this, each brand uses a different combination of vitamins in different dosages. Some brands recommended taking supplements other than their multivitamin. Other brands say their multivitamin is all-inclusive. Each brand has their own research to back up their findings, and third-party research has been inconclusive.

Another problem with comparing multivitamins and choosing among the various supplements those that are healthiest is the popular literature that claims to assist the average person in sorting through the supplements available in a modern vitamin store. The most widely read of these books is The Comparative Guide to Nutritional Supplements by Lyle MacWilliam. Early on, this book was hailed as championing the average consumer, but soon several faults came to be detected.

While MacWilliam claims that all of the assertions and conclusions in his book are based on scientific evidence, experts claim that nothing could be further from the truth and the book is undoubtedly biased. Some experts claim that the entire book is nothing than an overblown and overly successful marketing ploy by USANA Essentials, a network marketing company and pharmaceutical manufacturer whose products are highly recommended in the book.

Even though MacWilliam's book may have been nothing more than a marketing ploy, it still contains a lot of good information. The first three chapters are an invaluable treatise on disease, antioxidants, and free radicals in which a case is made for maintaining proper nutrition and dietary supplementation.

It is a shame that the rest of the book does not follow the example set by the first three chapters. Instead, those first chapters set MacWilliam up as an expert in nutrition, so readers are made to believe the information in the later chapters. As it turns out, this information was never peer-reviewed by anyone in the scientific community, so it becomes relegated to mere opinion.

The Manufacturing of Nutritional Supplements
One of the factors that must be considered in comparing nutritional supplements is the quality of the manufacturing process. The Comparative Guide states that very few manufacturers of dietary supplements follow strict standards of quality control. Of course, there is no proof offered to back up this claim. The fact of the matter is that most manufacturers in the United States and Canada do indeed follow a process that meets the standards set up by the Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP).

The attack against many vitamin manufacturers as producing bad quality and impure supplements is completely unfounded. MacWilliam backs up his claim with a single example and somehow makes a leap that it applies to the majority of companies. The example cited doesn't even apply to modern manufacturing processes because it dates back to 1908, and the example is only about a single product – echinacea.

That being said, there is still a variance in the quality of supplements that is based on how they are manufactured. The greatest variance in the quality is due to the form of the nutrient. There is more than a single source for almost every nutrient and some of these are more readily absorbed by the human body than others. It still makes sense to compare the nutritional labels of supplements in order to make sure that the most bioavailable form is being used. In addition, there is a question on if the nutrient is animal or plant-based that may a play a large part in the decision by vegans or vegetarians.

The Science of the Blended Standard
The Comparative Guide to Nutritional Supplements relies on testing standard created by MacWilliam called the Blended Standard. He claims to have developed it by averaging the recommendations of four so-called independent experts, all of whom happen to agree with MacWilliam's personal opinion on nutritional matters. None of the thousands of other independent experts with widely differing viewpoints and data from scientific studies to back up those viewpoints were considered.

Those who dared to look more closely at the four independent experts that were used found that they were not so independent, after all. They all had interests in specific manufacturers of nutritional supplements. Three of them market and sell their own lines of supplements, and the fourth has worked directly for USANA in the past. Finally, even though these four all have some expertise in the area of nutritional supplements, none of them are recognized as being nutritional experts by any medical association or governing body.

Much of the lengthy explanation of Blended Standard in the book seems to be nothing more than a clever subterfuge arranged to hide the fact that it does not rely on any type of tre scientific evidence. No outside scientific studies are part of the equation, and in some cases, the data presented is skewed to favor USANA Essentials. It would be wrong to say that MacWilliam is deliberately misleading the public, but it can be stated with certainty that his methods are non-scientific and careless.

Taking a closer look at MacWilliam's own definition on how the Blended Standard was created shows several discrepancies. In each case, the discrepancy favors USANA-branded products. One such discrepancy is that for a nutrient to be recommended in a product by using the Blended Standard, it must have a recommended dose that is agreed upon by two of the four experts. In the case of lutein, only one of the four gives a recommended dose, but MacWilliam states is as being recommended by using the Blended Standard. This invalidates all conclusions that are formed as a basis of his farcical standard.

The last reason why the Blended Standard cannot be taken seriously is because of the use of averages. Many of the experts disagree dramatically on a recommended dose for several nutrients. To solve this problem, MacWilliam simply averages the recommendations and presents the average as the dose that should be taken. Where is the science in that?


Breaking Down


Ignoring the Facts
One of the biggest problems with the Comparative Guide to Nutritional Supplements is that quantity is used exclusively in the comparisons. There is no consideration made for the source of the nutrient and its absorption rate by the human body. This can make a very big difference in the quality of a supplement, and ignoring the absorption rate makes comparing the dosage completely irrelevant. MacWilliam even admits this within the text of the book. He claims that such considerations are "beyond the scope" of the book and will therefore be ignored, even though "such considerations are significant in the overall determination of product quality."

After this statement, it is impossible to understand how anyone can continue to take the comparison seriously. It is a full admission that the comparisons in the book have nothing to do with the effectiveness of the supplements. The fact remains that no matter the dosage of a particular nutrient, it will not do any good if it passes through the body and is eliminated completely unused. This is a common occurrence in several nutrients that are available in multiple forms.

Many forms of copper cannot be absorbed by the body. The same goes for iron and vitamin E. One of the most popularized nutrients that falls into this category is calcium. People were taking calcium supplements for years before the medical community realized that the cheap form used by most manufacturers was not doing anyone a lick of good.

A true comparative study will take the source into consideration. Once the bioavailability of the specific nutrient is known, the dose can then be adjusted so the proper amount gets absorbed by the body. In addition, some nutrients are not well-absorbed in a pill form. Only a liquid form can be absorbed by the body.

A True Comparison
A true comparison of nutritional supplements will rely on much more than what was put into the Comparative Guide. The following are all considerations that must be made:
Potency – More is not better. In some cases, such as with vitamin A and iron, too high a dose can be toxic.
Bioavailability – The bioavailability of the nutrient must be taken into consideration along with the actual dosage.
Vitamin E – Some forms of vitamin E are not beneficial when taken orally.
Cardiac health – All nutrients should be included for complete heart and circulatory

Health.
Bone health – All nutrients should be included for complete bone health, especially for women.Antioxidants – Only antioxidants that have proven effectiveness in scientific studies should be in the supplement. Glucose Metabolism – The supplement should contain nutrients for the regulation of glucose levels. Bioflavonoids – These should be included in a bioavailable form. Toxic compounds – The supplement should be free of unnecessary and toxic ingredients for maximum safety. To know more please visit: Nutricula "The Science of Longevity Journal" To know more about the Organic E.V.E System please go to: Organic-EVE.com

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

How Aging and Overall Health Are Affected by DNA's Response to Stress

How Aging and Overall Health Are Affected by DNA's Response to Stress


As readers of Nutricula no doubt know, DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) strands are the so-called "building blocks of life". DNA's are housed in the genes of chromosomes, and contain the parent organism's ID, if you will.

It's been said that there are fewer than 1 in 10,000,000 errors in DNA replication. DNA is familiar to us as two long strands of nucleotide sequences—known as the double helix—held together by hydrogen bonds. Nearly every cell in a person's body has the same DNA. (Some may be found in the mitochondria.)

Replication and What Can Go Wrong

When cells divide, each new cell needs to have an exact copy of the DNA that's in the old cell. Cells divide at different rates; skin cells, for instance, divide rapidly and muscle cells do not divide at all. After replication, an enzyme called the polymerase actually proofreads the copy!

If there is an error, RNA comes into play. RNA, or ribonucleic acid, is a chain of molecules which carries a copy of the genomic information. In this manner, the DNA molecules process information and help all our organs repair and regenerate

Without a functioning DNA and its "assistant", RNA, it would not be possible for cells to reproduce, or to transport genetic material around within the cell. And all of this micro-activity of which we are not the slightest bit aware constitutes the essence of looking and feeling young. When our DNA is doing its job, we are functioning at maximum capacity and all systems are "go". But what could happen to interfere with our DNA? For instance, what if we are under stress?

What Role Does Stress Play?

What we're going to look at in this article is what role stress plays, if any, on these two crucial nucleic acids and on their functions. As a natural extension of this question, we'll be looking at the point at which aging is then a natural result of the DNA alterations that occur as a result of stress.

As we will see, science has found ongoing evidence that these factors are, indeed, connected and that faulty DNA repair appears to result in premature aging. As every organ contains DNA, the decline in function of organs in the body is one commonly recognized sign of aging. Note: it is becoming widely recognized by mainstream medicine, as well as alternative medicine, that it is abnormal for the body to age as quickly as it does in modern society. We are designed to live well over a hundred years of age, and to remain in good, vibrant health throughout most of our lives.

What Causes Premature Aging?

Premature aging is a result of chemical, cellular and organ imbalances…when our wonderfully complex system sustains glitches, or things don't "go according to plan". Stress—when it is a highly presented phenomenon, as opposed to the everyday dalliances with the little stresses of life that motivate us to function—is one big reason things don't go according to God's plan.

Up until fairly recently, it was not known to what extent the mind-body connection permeates the very inner workings of our existence…our "building blocks". Looked at from an overview, as parts of our mind-body connection, the physiological effects of stress are well-known. Cortisol, which is released during the "fight or flight" response, is being looked at in new studies as the cause of many health problems, not the least of which is its ability to impair the immune system.

Cortisol – Too Much (Or Too Little) of a Good Thing

Cortisol comes in very handy when we need it…in a real life-or-death situation…as this adrenal hormone regulates carbohydrate metabolism and blood pressure. On the flip side, Cortisol, a by-product of stress "ages brain cells…and builds fat around the body's midsection," says Phyllis A. Balch, CNC, in Prescriptions for Nutritional Healing, 4th Edition.

Indeed, if we lead stressful lives where our cells are bombarded with Cortisol, it leads back to the DNA connection, and our roughly 3 billion base pairs of this very fabric of life. Balch goes on to state that "…stress increases the level of an immune system protein called interleukin-6 which has direct effects on most of the cells in the body and is associated with many disorders…"

Diseases which can occur as a result of too much Cortisol in the body, such as diabetes, arthritis, cancer, osteoporosis, Alzheimer's disease, periodontal disease and cardiovascular disease, go hand-in-glove with aging. As the body malfunctions, so does its vitality and vibrancy…and its ability to bounce back.

Interestingly enough, scientists are now saying that too low of a Cortisol count may indicate that low Cortisol receptors occur in the brains of persons who suffered early trauma. These persons are, therefore, less "in tune" with the immediate stress-dampening effects of Cortisol. (This would suggest that this lessened sensitivity was transmitted via the genes.)

Oxidative Stress Can Be Overcome

Another factor that ages us is oxidative stress. When we engage in the healthy pastime of exercise, the body responds to exercise partly by oxidizing, or aging. However, this is normal, and can be remedied by antioxidant supplements. If a person does not supplement, after a period of time, external signs of oxidative stress will include lined and wrinkled skin.

(A few of the antioxidants which will remedy this are Vitamins A, C, E, Selenium and COQ10. A few others are being touted as important, such as glutathione and SOD, or superoxidedismutase.)

There are many causes of oxidative stress, from smoking to heavy metal, to irradiation from X-rays. Dr. Denham Harman, "father of the free radical theory of aging", first isolated polyunsaturated fats as highly carcinogenic. He was also able to demonstrate a lengthened life expectancy with the use of antioxidants.

Oxidative stress creates an imbalance between the body's ability to product reactive oxygen and to detoxify it. Reactive Oxygen Species, or "free radicals", can damage a cell's lipids, proteins or DNA.

"Defense against oxidative stress depends primarily on an orchestrated synergism between several endogenous and exogenous antioxidants." ("The Calorie Restriction Society International", crsociety.org.) Endogenous simply means we can find these substances either in our foods, or they exist in our bodies. Exogenous means derived or existing externally.

What Supplements Do We Need?

There are roughly 13 vitamins and about two dozen minerals we are known to need. Included in this category are the ever-expanding list of supplements and culinary herbs which are being proven by science to provide health benefits. Some of these are the antioxidants mentioned above, as well as food enzymes, flax seed oil, garlic, glucosamine, lecithin, COQ10 and quercitin.

As we examine the issue a little deeper, we see that stress actually attacks DNA, causing strand breaks. In mammalian studies which were conducted to study DNA damage ("Nucleic Acids Research", 1995, Vol. 23, No. 15), it was found that these strand breaks—which mean the DNA strands are damaged, and its ability to replicate impaired—were produced by oxidative stress.

In the book Adaptive Protection of the Heart: Protecting Against Stress and Ischemic Damage, by Felix Z. Meerson, CRC Press, we learn that "stress substantially decrease[s] the half-life of ribosomal RNA and increase[s] the percentage of RNA replaced…in the internal organs."

(As readers will recall, ribosomes are the components of cells that make proteins from amino acids, which are small, organic molecules; i.e., DNA makes RNA, which then makes protein.)

This level of stress is nowhere more causally related than in the heart muscle. Meerson goes on to say that: "This complex of changes directly testifying to enhanced breakdown of RNA [was, in research] clearly pronounced in cardiac muscle."

What is Non-Emotional Stress?

Stress that damages our cells does not have to be emotional. It can also take the form of environmental stressors, such as UV radiation and certain chemicals. "The main source of DNA mutations is the replication errors" (Replication, again, is an enzyme-related process by which the strands of the DNA make exact copies of itself.) "Replication slippage is the common…error observed. [when the new strand mispairs.] When the replication mutation occurs in the coding region, it results in the formation of abnormal proteins that lead to diseases." Tutorvista.com.

Skin—the Largest Indicator of Our Health

In the Textbook of Aging Skin, by Farage, Miller and Maibach, Springer, we see that "Overall…lower repair capacity might account for accumulated DNA damage found in [the] skin of older subjects and this might result in the chromosome instability, [and] cellular growth arrest. Apoptosis [a type of cell death]…and chronic dermal inflammation [is] induced by...oxidative stress."

Our skin—a marker for youth—is the largest elimination organ in the body, and the most accurate indicator of stress. As we get older, we have to pay attention to the epidermis, which is composed of mostly dead cells which have migrated up from inner layers. These cells are constantly sloughing off, so, given a chance, the skin renews itself. And, much more important, our collagen needs to be produced.

"DNA binds to collagen directly, to form DNA-collagen complex." (Abstract, International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, "DNA as a Matrix of Collagen Fibrils".)

How Do We Stimulate Critical Collagen?

How do we stimulate cells to produce collagen? First, we'll describe collagen. Collagen is a mesh of fibers; a protein that is a biologic polymer which consists of amino acids. It is a supporting mesh that aids in the skin's elasticity, firmness and texture.

As with all remedial actions we can take, it involves taking our endogenous and exogenous balance seriously. If certain substances are in the body, we should replenish them, by eating living foods with plenty of enzymes—the same types that aid in our complex chemical orchestration—and by avoiding what is bound to cause stress to the DNA.

These stressors include chemicals (such as those found in processed foods and pesticides), smog, smoke, alcohol and the like. If we require a substance, and, for whatever reason, it is not found in the body, we should supplement. We must build a firm foundation on which to attempt to correct any weak links.

Skin cells called fibroblasts repair broken collagen fibers with new ones but, as we age, this ability is diminished. Gaps and irregularities in the skin occur, and some of them are visible.

We can help the body to produce collagen as we get older by taking Vitamin C (ascorbic acid). Do your research to see how many milligrams you might need to take.

Since collagen consists of small amino acids, we should provide what the body recognizes and can use…more amino acids. There are 20 different types in human cells, but a few amino acids—glycine, hydroxyproline and proline—are found in collagen.

There is Much We Can Do!

As you can see, there is much we can do to keep our body in balance, naturally. Part of this involves working with our marvellously complex DNA strands to ensure we continue functioning in perfect synchronicity, as nature meant us to.

We are bombarded with thousands of stressors every day, so there's bound to be cellular damage. What we can do is work to help our bodies repair the intracellular damage. Doing so will ensure we live a long and youthful life into our prime and onwards. As it has been said of us throughout the ages.

Saturday, January 29, 2011

FABULOUS FOODS FOR A HEALTHY HEART

February is Heart Health Month – what better time to talk about foods that can help reduce your risk of and even reverse heart disease. When people hear the words “heart disease”, the first thing that comes to mind is high cholesterol. Abnormal lipid levels are just one thing that can damage your heart and increase your risk of heart attack, heart failure, and stroke. Other conditions of an unhealthy heart include high blood pressure, arterial stiffness,
and elevated blood sugar. All of these conditions are related to increased inflammation in
the body. The way to heal oneself is to decrease the intake pro-inflammatory foods and instead focus on filling the body full of anti-inflammatory foods. Read the full article at: http://www.nutricula-u.com

Functional Foods Living Nutraceuticals.

The principles of The “Organic E.V.E.” System are based on the concepts of cultivating vegetables whose roots are not introduced in a substratum or soil, but in enclosed chambers constantly exposed to flowing plant nutrition.

In these chambers the roots can find the optimal growth conditions of oxygenation and moisture allowing for superior plant-nutrient exposure, optimal and balanced assimilation of nutrients, and subsequently, the faster, more efficient development of vegetation/aggregate food sources. The “Organic E.V.E.” System is constructed in a way that not only completely modernizes the bio-shelter design but also allows for easy access to any of its component parts at any time.

Read more at http://www.nutricula-u.com

Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Coenzyme Q10 - Amazing Dietary Supplement

by Jason Earls
Coenzyme Q10, also known as CoQ10, is a powerful antioxidant compound, due to its ability to transfer electrons in the human body, and also eliminate damaging free radicals that harm blood vessels.
CoQ10 is a nutrient found in human beings and animals and is also known by the names, Ubidecarenone, and ubiquinone. The primary function of CoQ10 is energy production and to help other bio-energetic processes within cells of the body. CoQ10 was discovered in 1957 by Fred L. Crane, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

NUTRICULA 'THE SCIENCE OF LONGEVITY BLOG".


From The Editor:

There is simply not enough money in the world that could ever replace the intrinsic value of a well-functioning heart nor an efficient circulatory system. Emerson, an "intellectual protestari" by his own proclamation, who appears to have been a firm advocate of self-preservation, (and the belief that health of body, mind and soul must precede all or any monetary gain), truly "hits the target" in this context of thought here! In a contemporary society where we take for granted the "gifts" which modern science and medicine have provided to us, (i.e., modern and applied Gerontology Medicine and Science that have allowed us to "exist" longer), even this technology will never replace the applied dogma of true longevity; that neither the wealth attained through money, power, nor fame can ever compensate for an unhealthy, unkempt, diseased-ridden body.

Robert Berger, MS, MVSc, PhD. Editor-In-Chief/President, Nutricula Publishing, Inc